Contact   |   Staff  |   Contribute  |   Advertise  |   Site Map  |   Legal
Al Di Meola Interview

Al Di Meola Interview

February 12th, 2007 by

Al Di Meola - by Ivan ChopikWorld-renowned guitar virtuoso Al Di Meola known for his eclectic mix of Latin jazz-fusion and fiery guitar lines. Over the years, he’s been named Best Jazz Guitarist in Guitar Player Magazine’s Reader Poll four times. His career first took off in 1974 during his studies at Berklee College of Music, when he was chosen to play guitar for Chick Corea’s band – Return to Forever. Besides having a productive solo career, he’s also become very well known for his collaborations with artists such as Paco de Lucía and John McLaughlin. Check out for more information on this world-class artist and his music, as well as sound clips from his latest releases.

IC: What’s going on currently in the world of Al Di Meola?

ADM: Last year I put out two new records. One of them is a record called Consequence of Chaos with guests like Chick Corea, Steve Gadd, John Patitucci, and my own touring band – Gumbi Ortiz, Mario Parmisano, and Victor Miranda… and that record was kind of a return to my playing solidbody electric guitar again, even with the inclusion of a couple of acoustic pieces. And then I recently myself put out a CD, which is available on CDBaby, called Diabolic Inventions and Seduction for Solo Guitar. It’s a collection of my renditions of Astor Piazzolla’s solo guitar work (Astor being the father of classical Tango). That record is probably the newest at the moment. And then I have scheduled from March through the summer tours with my group, which will take us primarily through Europe.

IC: The new album, Consequence of Chaos, is your first electric guitar album in about ten years and it has a really fresh vibe to it. What were your inspirations this album and how would you say it differs from your previous releases?

ADM: I think my writing has evolved somewhat, so I think it’s going to be more interesting on the level of inclusions of world music elements… just new influences primarily. But also on the production side of things I get into using new gadgets and sounds that add a new modded element to the sound. So the palette becomes wider in terms of what can be used to further enhance the imagination.

IC: Your compositions combine elements of Latin music, jazz, fusion, R&B, and pop. How would you describe your style and where do you see it heading towards in the future?

ADM: Usually the future is up for grabs. In other words, it’s where your imagination can take you – where your current influences are at the very time that you hear something new that might stimulate a new direction in writing and playing. Most musicians that I admire, and I use it as the same for myself… we’re constantly on a search for the next thing or the new thing that can generate that kind of stimulation. So that’s up for grabs. Right now I just let it happen as it happens.

I’m also hoping to see a reformation of Return to Forever. Maybe next year I hope. We’re going to make another attempt at convincing Chick [Corea]… it’s mostly a wonderful thing for our fans that have been dying to see this for the last 25 years, but it’s also a whole new generation that will come out to see this kind of band. It’s a legendary group… and you see everybody else doing it – The Police, Van Halen, and then The Eagles – they were bands that basically hated one another and are all getting back together. So there’s no reason why this shouldn’t happen.

IC: You recently had several collaborations more in the pop genre, such as the album Cosmopolitan Life. Why the departure from your signature fusion sound?

ADM: Well, only because of an interesting offer you might want to say. A lot of us grew up with pop music and it is so much a part of our culture. I started, as very few of us started, with jazz when we were young. Most of us started listening to rock and pop. And it’s just very much a part of my inspirations earlier on. The offer came to do something that was completely different – out of the box. And that at the time that I was offered the possibility seemed to be more stimulating than doing the same old thing and I felt that after 20 records of my own I could afford the chance and the opportunity to do something that was far left or far right in this case, because it went down the middle.

Al watching his daughter, who joined him on stage

Al watching his daughter, who joined him on stage

But with Cosmopolitan Life the record in actuality and all fairness is the music of this Russian pop singer. It’s not my music. I was just actually honored, but also surprised that they would give me such credit as being an equal partnership which it really is Leonid Agutin’s record. I lent my support on some production ideas and also my playing. They wanted to give more credit than I thought I was actually due. But anyway, it was a cool thing to do.

IC: When did you attend Berklee and how long were you there? What was your major?

ADM: I was there I think from ’73 to ’74 and my major was Guitar Performance. Not a degree course, it was a diploma course. And I remember that it was a very good experience for me since most classes related to my instrument, which is what I wanted. I didn’t want to have to go into any kind of academic classes that were unrelated. So between the classes, which I got a lot out of, and the fact that there was the community of musicians mostly highly motivated in the area of music that I liked. There were plenty of jam sessions and stimulating shows in the area.

IC: What would you say is the most important thing that you took away from the whole Berklee experience?

ADM: Well, let’s see. In each category I think I took something away from the school. It was the overall sum of the interesting parts of harmony primarily. But in each category, arranging and harmony became an important ingredient in my development. It was all different kinds of classes relating to ear training and things of that nature that I haven’t gotten before that experience even though I had a guitar instructor from the age of 9 when I started. This was the next level and it afforded me the basis for being ready for the experience that I had at 19 years old playing with Chick Corea.

IC: And I’m sure that you spent a good amount of time working with all this material. As a developing guitar player, what was your practice regime like?

ADM: Well it was on Mass[achusetts] Ave in the dormitories. I shared one room with two other guitarists, so we had the three of us and my designated area for private practice was in the giant closet that was in this particular room, which was on the fourth floor, I believe. I spent I think 8 hours a day in that closet. I was really motivated let’s say… to the point of insanity.

IC: While many guitarists work on techniques used in soloing, many overlook the rhythm aspect of playing guitar. You are very proficient in both areas, so how would you suggest to approach working on rhythm chops?

ADM: Every guitarist needs to be able – needs to – be able to tap their foot in time as they play. And if they can’t, they usually have a very, very serious problem with time. Where most guitarists that I find, even at higher levels and maybe some times celebrity levels, I find that they set the time and it’s not as good as they think. And whenever they play syncopations, when asked that they tap the time you watch that their time actually goes off, because the syncopation influences their time, and they get thrown off. And even if it’s momentary, it’s still breaking that moment of fluidity. I find it to be a real hindrance because once you tap into finding if you actually have a good sense of time it opens a tremendous door for possibilities rhythmically.

Al Di Meola - by Ivan ChopikAnd there are players that have this naturally. Usually it comes naturally. You either have it or you don’t have it. The guitarists have to find it. And if you’re not able to tap in time you’ll have a very difficult time I find with that door opening. It’s a whole study onto itself, one of which no school is even close to, because they don’t find it to be that important. But in reality, your tapping into the rhythm aspect is probably more important than anything. You can always learn harmony, no matter who you are. You can learn all other aspects of music, but you can’t learn rhythm. Rhythm is the ability to tap into the natural aspects of time. It’s something that you either have or you don’t. There’s a path on which to find that, but right away I think guitar players have to study when they practice, they really have to focus on tapping their foot in time so that when they play their accents and their syncopations that the foot doesn’t move a hair in terms of it going out of time. And it’s a very difficult study.

IC: Your technique has inspired many players to spend hours with a metronome. However, some people misinterpret speed and technique as something that prevails over the actual substance of the song. How do you respond to such comments?

ADM: My personal feeling on that comment is, (because there’s a lot of controversy on technique and speed as if they are a frivolous and self-indulgent kind of thing that overrides everything else), that it definitely is the most important thing to be able to have great technique, because if you don’t have good technique, you can’t execute what’s in your head. What good is that? So if your emotions take you to a place of a burst of energy and your technique is sloppy, that is for me the worst thing that I would want to hear in a player, because that determines the great players from the not so great players.

Now, the other aspects [of guitar playing] are also of incredible importance… if the choices of the notes are not hip, or the composition is not worthy then it all kind of adds to some effect – or defect. But it comes back to the technique – absolutely, it’s extremely important, because sloppiness is the first key that the guy doesn’t have his stuff together. I’m sorry to inform the ones that can’t do it out there. I’m even gonna piss them off more – the hammering thing and the sweeping thing is ok, but the guys that can pick that stuff are the leaders. The best players, when it comes down to it, (and I look at guys that I look up to like Chick [Corea] or some great flamenco players) have phenomenal articulation. They can actually play it, not sweep around it or hit one note and hammer-on the rest, because the actual effect is not as strong and it’s easier to do. Some can do it very artistically, mind you. Like Eddie Van Halen can do his thing the best in that realm. But the ones that impress me the most are the ones that can actually play it.

IC: It’s interesting, one of the other guitarists that also worked with Chick Corea over the years is Frank Gambale. He’s one of the masters of sweeping.

ADM: Right. Now Frank’s a great player. Don’t get me wrong, his ideas are really nice and he plays really good and everything. Now, if you were able to play pick all that stuff then what you would have is more of the same effect that I would get when I listen to somebody like Chick, who has phenomenal articulation. So I gravitate more towards articulate players, that’s all.

Ivan Chopik with Al Di Meola in 2007

Ivan Chopik with Al Di Meola in 2007

IC: What advice can you give to aspiring musicians here at Berklee and everywhere?

ADM: Try not to make it too soon. Try to go through more semesters than I did (laughs). There’s a lot to learn at Berklee. I was almost sorry I had to leave so soon, but I had those opportunities to keep quick. But just absorb as much as you can from school and go to as many live shows as possible, because that’s where you usually learn more and inspiration drives you.

I would try to copy as best as you can the guys that influence you the most, because in the course of trying to do what they do you’ll develop to your own voice – that’s my advice. But also try to really focus on tapping your foot when you play and making sure that any accents or speed that you exhibit on the technical side of things, that it doesn’t influence the time that you’re keeping with your foot. And if that happens, then you’d have a rhythmic sickness that needs to be overcome, even if that means working with a metronome.

Al Di Meola Interview

About Ivan Chopik

Ivan Chopik founded Guitar Messenger in the Fall of 2007 and is currently running the online magazine as Editor-in-Chief, webmaster, and writer. He is also a guitarist, composer, and audio engineer who graduated from Berklee College of Music in May 2012 with a Bachelor of Music degree in Guitar Performance, Music Business & Management, and Music Production/Engineering.

View other posts by
Visit Ivan Chopik's Website:

  • Pingback: Guitar Messenger – Learning to Use a Metronome Effectively Part 1: Nervous Tick?()

  • Pingback: Guitar Messenger – Vinnie Moore Interview()

    • Seduciary

      Al DiMeola, even more than McLaughlin, was responsible for the current rash of alternate-picking speed demon Rock/Metal players we have today. Unfortunately, Metal is slightly taking a turn for the worst, with this ridiculous CHUGGA CHUGGA drop-tuning fad which focuses on what they call the “BRUTAL” tone.

  • Dude

    Guys like DiMeola worry more about playing the guitar than creating music. Yes, you need to learn to play in order to execute your ideas but these guys have brains that are wired differently. They aspire to be the best guitar players in the world. They can’t really write memorable music so they concentrate on becoming incredible guitar players. A legitimate goal if you want to be the best guitar player in the world but it has nothing to do with being the best musician in the world.
    EVH is a better guitarist than DiMeola because he is a better musician. Guys like DiMeola may pretend that rock and roll is too simple and beneath them but that’s because these guys couldn’t write a memorable riff if their lives depended on it. Learning to pick every single note and play 10 different styles is great but its a poor substitute for creating memorable music.

    • Seduciary

      “EVH is a better guitarist than DiMeola because he is a better musician.”

      What a bunch of ill-informed crock. Di Meola is both a better musician (Berklee trained), and we don’t need to mention who’s the more skilled guitarist. The fact that Di Meola was able to play on par with John McLaughlin and Paco De Lucia on acoustic guitar speaks for itself. At Best, EVH can write better “hit” material for the radio, but that has nothing to do with being a better musician and a better guitarist. Stop being another fan-boy, and get your facts strait before posting such clueless drivel.

    • Seduciary

      “They aspire to be the best guitar players in the world. They can’t really write memorable music so they concentrate on becoming incredible guitar players.”

      So what’s wrong with aspiring to be the best guitar player in the world?!? “Memorable music” is just a euphemism for “commercial” music. You sound like another case of jealously and sour grapes. Perhaps you should peruse Di Meola’s instructional video “Reh Video 5” and learn how to alternate-pick, instead of posting this nonsense about creating “memorable music” :)


    All of Al Di’s albums are beautifully arranged and produced. While I still enjoy Land of the Midnight Sun (1976), which is an essential jazz album, I much more enjoy how he has evolved over the years and changed his style after 1986. Al’s albums from the late-1990s are truly outstanding.

    I remember how in the late 1970s Al was attacked as a speed demon, and I could see why he was so attacked: he was racing around just like everyone else at the time, but Al was the best at it, so he became a target.

    To “Dude” I would want to ask what “better” music Eddie van Halen has made? Does anyone remember anything he has done since, what, Panama? Eddie has not “evolved” or challenged his style. In fact, Eddie’s style is simply the thoughtless raining of quick notes according to the dictates of finger gymnastics and happenstance. EvH never even listens to his rhythm section and is obviously not really aware of any meaning, lyrically or feel-wise, that his stupid songs may have. Nope, EvH just “jams” a lot of dumb notes. But hey, he is a rough and ready musician who is just wild, man. “He jams”, I am sure “Dude” and his kind grunt.

    Finally, I am sick and tired of boneheads who are able to divine “true” artistry in mediocre and poor musicianship and then sneer at those who can actually play.


    It just occurred to me that my post of a moment ago is far to easy on Eddie van Halen. Upon reflection it must be acknowledged that after “Eruption/You Really Got Me” from waaaay back in 1977, Eddie has stagnated with his gimmicky tapping. OK the Mean Streets album has some nice moments, but really he has just been another drunk millionaire coasting on what he did back in the mid-1970s.

    On the other hand, Al DiMeola has evolved and challenged himself–changing his style, even.


    Al DiMeola has written dozens of memorable melodies. And his solos soar. “Land of the Midnight Sun”, “Passion, Grace, and Fire”–top those, washed up 1980s pretty boys.

    I suppose Van Halen songs sort of have melodies, kind of like Marines shouting while jogging in formation. PANAMA! RUNNIN’ WITH THE DEVIL! Wooo! Party!
    Now, I am sure that “Dude” would say “That’s Entertainment!”

    But mostly Van Halen was popular because it had a succession of clowns as lead singers. I expect to see David Lee Roth in blackface in Las Vegas any year, along with Sammy in a Fat Elvis while leather suit.